Jump to content

Globular Amphora culture: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
millennium, not century
(27 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Archaeological culture in Central Europe}}
{{Infobox archaeological culture
{{Infobox archaeological culture
|name = Globular Amphora culture
|name = Globular Amphora culture
Line 6: Line 7:
|horizon =
|horizon =
|region = [[Central Europe]]
|region = [[Central Europe]]
|period = [[Chalcolithic Europe]]
|period = [[Chalcolithic Europe|Chalcolithic]]
|dates = ''circa'' 3400 BCE – ''circa'' 2800 BCE
|dates = ''circa'' 3400 BCE – ''circa'' 2800 BCE
|typesite =
|typesite =
Line 14: Line 15:
|followedby = [[Corded Ware culture]]
|followedby = [[Corded Ware culture]]
}}
}}
The '''Globular Amphora culture''' ('''GAC''', {{Lang-de|text=Kugelamphoren-Kultur}} (KAK); {{Lang-ru|Культура шаровидных амфор|translit=Kultura sharovidnykh amfor}}), c. 3400–2800 BC, is an [[archaeological culture]] in [[Central Europe]]. [[Marija Gimbutas]] assumed an [[Indo-European languages|Indo-European]] origin,<ref>{{cite book|title=The Living Goddesses|author=Marija Gimbutas|author-link=Marija Gimbutas|publisher=University of California Press|year=2001|page=188|isbn=978-0520229150}}</ref> though this is contradicted by newer genetic studies that show a connection to the earlier wave of [[Early European Farmers]] rather than to [[Western Steppe Herders]] from the [[Ukraine|Ukrainian]] and western-southern [[Russia]]n steppes.<ref>Tassi, F. et al. (2017). Genome diversity in the Neolithic Globular Amphorae culture and the spread of Indo-European languages. Proc. R. Soc. B 284:20171540. https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1540</ref>
The '''Globular Amphora culture''' ('''GAC''', {{Lang-de|text=Kugelamphoren-Kultur}} (KAK); c. 3400–2800 BC, is an [[archaeological culture]] in [[Central Europe]]. [[Marija Gimbutas]] assumed an [[Indo-European languages|Indo-European]] origin,<ref>{{cite book|title=The Living Goddesses|author=Marija Gimbutas|author-link=Marija Gimbutas|publisher=University of California Press|year=2001|page=188|isbn=978-0520229150}}</ref> though this is contradicted by newer genetic studies that show a connection to the earlier wave of [[Early European Farmers]] rather than to [[Western Steppe Herders]] from the [[Ukraine|Ukrainian]] and south-western [[Russia]]n steppes.<ref>Tassi, F. et al. (2017). Genome diversity in the Neolithic Globular Amphorae culture and the spread of Indo-European languages. Proc. R. Soc. B 284:20171540. https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1540</ref>


The GAC preceded the [[Corded Ware culture]] in its central area. Somewhat to the south and west, it was bordered by the [[Baden culture]]. To the northeast was the [[Narva culture]]. It occupied much of the same area as the earlier [[Funnelbeaker culture]]. The name was coined by [[Gustaf Kossinna]] because of the characteristic pottery, globular-shaped pots with two to four handles.
The GAC preceded the [[Corded Ware culture]] in its central area. Somewhat to the south and west, it was bordered by the [[Baden culture]]. To the northeast was the [[Narva culture]]. It occupied much of the same area as the earlier [[Funnelbeaker culture]]. The name was coined by [[Gustaf Kossinna]] because of the characteristic pottery, globular-shaped pots with two to four handles.
Line 25: Line 26:
==Economy==
==Economy==
{{unreferenced section|date=July 2017}}
{{unreferenced section|date=July 2017}}
[[File:GlobularAmphoraPiatraNeamt.JPG|thumb|Globular Amphora]]
The economy was based on raising a variety of livestock, pigs particularly in its earlier phase, in distinction to the Funnelbeaker culture's preference for cattle. Settlements are sparse, and these normally just contain small clusters pits. No convincing house-plans have yet been excavated. It is suggested that some of these settlements were not year-round, or indeed may have been temporary.


The economy was based on raising a variety of livestock, pigs particularly in its earlier phase, in distinction to the Funnelbeaker culture's preference for cattle. Settlements are sparse, and these normally just contain small clusters pits. No convincing house-plans have yet been excavated. It is suggested that some of these settlements were not year-round, or indeed may have been temporary.
==Burials==


==Burials==
[[File:GlobularAmphoraPiatraNeamt.JPG|thumb|Globular Amphora]]
The GAC is primarily known from its burials. [[Inhumation]] was in a pit or [[cist]]. A variety of grave offerings were left, including animal parts (such as a pig's jaw) or even whole animals, e.g., oxen. Grave gifts include the typical globular amphorae and stone axes. There are also cattle-burials, often in pairs, accompanied by grave gifts. There are also secondary burials in [[Megalith]]ic graves.
The GAC is primarily known from its burials. [[Inhumation]] was in a pit or [[cist]]. A variety of grave offerings were left, including animal parts (such as a pig's jaw) or even whole animals, e.g., oxen. Grave gifts include the typical globular amphorae and stone axes. There are also cattle-burials, often in pairs, accompanied by grave gifts. There are also secondary burials in [[Megalith]]ic graves.


==Interpretation==
==Interpretation==
[[File:Globular Amphora pottery.png|thumb|Globular Amphora pottery]]

The inclusion of animals in the grave is seen as an intrusive cultural element by [[Marija Gimbutas]]. The practice of [[suttee]], hypothesized by Gimbutas is also seen as a highly intrusive cultural element. The supporters of the [[Kurgan]] hypothesis point to these distinctive burial practices and state this may represent one of the earliest migrations of [[Proto-Indo-Europeans|Indo-Europeans]] into Central Europe. In this context and given its area of occupation, this culture has been claimed as the underlying culture of a [[Germanic peoples|Germanic]]-[[Balts|Baltic]]-[[Slavic peoples|Slavic]] continuum.<ref>J. P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams, ''Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture'', Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, London and Chicago, 1997., "Globular Amphora culture"</ref>
The inclusion of animals in the grave is seen as an intrusive cultural element by [[Marija Gimbutas]]. The practice of [[suttee]], hypothesized by Gimbutas is also seen as a highly intrusive cultural element. The supporters of the [[Kurgan]] hypothesis point to these distinctive burial practices and state this may represent one of the earliest migrations of [[Proto-Indo-Europeans|Indo-Europeans]] into Central Europe. In this context and given its area of occupation, this culture has been claimed as the underlying culture of a [[Germanic peoples|Germanic]]-[[Balts|Baltic]]-[[Slavic peoples|Slavic]] continuum.<ref>J. P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams, ''Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture'', Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, London and Chicago, 1997., "Globular Amphora culture"</ref>


==Genetics==
==Genetics==
[[File:Globular amphora burial 1.jpg|thumb|Globular Amphora tomb|263x263px]]


Tassi et al. (2017) extracted fifteen samples of [[mtDNA]].{{sfn|Tassi|2017}} The majority of the samples belonged to subclades of [[Haplogroup U (mtDNA)|U]] and [[Haplogroup H (mtDNA)]], along with [[Haplogroup J (mtDNA)|J]], [[Haplogroup W (mtDNA)|W]] and [[Haplogroup K (mtDNA)|K]]. The remains were found to be closely related to [[Early European Farmers]] and [[Western Hunter-Gatherer]]s, with little genetic relation to the [[Yamnaya culture]] of [[Western Steppe Herders]] in the east. The authors of the study suggested that the Globulara Amphora culture was non-Indo-European-speaking, but with cultural influences from Yamnaya.
Tassi et al. (2017) extracted fifteen samples of [[mtDNA]].{{sfn|Tassi|2017}} The majority of the samples belonged to subclades of [[Haplogroup U (mtDNA)|U]] and [[Haplogroup H (mtDNA)]], along with [[Haplogroup J (mtDNA)|J]], [[Haplogroup W (mtDNA)|W]] and [[Haplogroup K (mtDNA)|K]]. The remains were found to be closely related to [[Early European Farmers]] and [[Western Hunter-Gatherer]]s, with little genetic relation to the [[Yamnaya culture]] of [[Western Steppe Herders]] in the east. The authors of the study suggested that the Globulara Amphora culture was non-Indo-European-speaking, but with cultural influences from Yamnaya.


Mathieson et al. (2018) included a genetic analysis of eight males of the Globular Amphora culture. Three of them carried [[Haplogroup I-M438#I-Z161|haplogroup I2a2a1b]] and a subclade of it; two carried [[Haplogroup I-M438#I-L158|I2a2]]; one carried [[Haplogroup I-M438|I2]]; one carried [[Haplogroup BT|BT]] and one carried [[Haplogroup CT|CT]].{{sfn|Mathieson|2018}} According to admixture analysis they also had approximately 70% EEF ancestry and 30% WHG ancestry, some of them with negligible [[Eastern Hunter-Gatherer]] and Yamnaya traces.{{sfn|Mathieson|2018|Extended Data Figure 2: Supervised ADMIXTURE analysis}}
Mathieson et al. (2018) included a genetic analysis of eight males of the Globular Amphora culture. Three of them carried [[Haplogroup I-M438#I-Z161|haplogroup I2a2a1b]] and a subclade of it; two carried [[Haplogroup I-M438#I-L158|I2a2]]; one carried [[Haplogroup I-M438|I2]]; one carried [[Haplogroup BT|BT]] and one carried [[Haplogroup CT|CT]].{{sfn|Mathieson|2018}} According to admixture analysis they also had approximately 70% EEF ancestry and 30% WHG ancestry, some of them with negligible [[Eastern Hunter-Gatherer]] and Yamnaya traces.{{sfn|Mathieson|2018|loc=Extended Data Figure 2: Supervised ADMIXTURE analysis}}


Schroeder et al. (2019) examined 15 skeletons from the [[Koszyce, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship|Koszyce]] mass grave in southern [[Poland]], which is ascribed to the Globular Amphora culture. The individuals were all shown to be members of an extended family, and to have been buried with great care by someone who knew them very well. Most of them were female and children. All had been executed by a violent blow to the head, perhaps by invading Corded Ware groups.{{Efn|"All individuals had been brutally killed by blows to the head, but buried with great care.... From a population genetic viewpoint, the individuals are clearly distinct from neighboring Corded Ware groups because of their lack of steppe-related ancestry. Although the reason for the massacre is unknown, it is possible that it was connected with the expansion of Corded Ware groups, which may have resulted in violent conflict."{{sfn|Schroeder|2019}} }} The older males of the family are missing from the grave, suggesting that they were away or had fled. Of the eight samples of [[Y-DNA]] extracted, all were found to belong to [[Haplogroup I-M438|I2a-L801]]. The fifteen samples of mtDNA extracted belonged to various subclades of [[Haplogroup T (mtDNA)|T]], [[Haplogroup H (mtDNA)|H]], [[Haplogroup J (mtDNA)|J]], [[Haplogroup K (mtDNA)|K]], [[Haplogroup HV (mtDNA)|HV]]. The skeletons were determined to have about 70% EEF ancestry and 30% WHG ancestry, meaning they had no Indo-European WSH-ancestry. The archaeological and genetic evidence collected from the grave indicated that the Globular Amphora culture was [[patriarchal]] and kinship-oriented, which appears to have been the norm for Late Neolithic communities in [[Central Europe]].{{sfn|Schroeder|2019}}
Schroeder et al. (2019) examined 15 skeletons from the [[Koszyce, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship|Koszyce]] mass grave in southern [[Poland]], which is ascribed to the Globular Amphora culture. The individuals were all shown to be members of an extended family, and to have been buried with great care by someone who knew them very well. Most of them were female and children. All had been executed by a violent blow to the head, perhaps by invading Corded Ware groups.{{Efn|"All individuals had been brutally killed by blows to the head, but buried with great care.... From a population genetic viewpoint, the individuals are clearly distinct from neighboring Corded Ware groups because of their lack of steppe-related ancestry. Although the reason for the massacre is unknown, it is possible that it was connected with the expansion of Corded Ware groups, which may have resulted in violent conflict."{{sfn|Schroeder|2019}} }} The older males of the family are missing from the grave, suggesting that they were away or had fled. Of the eight samples of [[Y-DNA]] extracted, all were found to belong to [[Haplogroup I-M438|I2a-L801]]. The fifteen mtDNA samples consisted of various subclades of [[Haplogroup T (mtDNA)|T]], [[Haplogroup H (mtDNA)|H]], [[Haplogroup J (mtDNA)|J]], [[Haplogroup K (mtDNA)|K]], [[Haplogroup HV (mtDNA)|HV]]. The skeletons showed about 70% EEF ancestry and 30% WHG ancestry, meaning they had no Indo-European WSH-ancestry. The archaeological and genetic evidence collected from the grave indicated that the Globular Amphora culture was [[patriarchal]] and kinship-oriented, which appears to have been the norm for Late Neolithic communities in [[Central Europe]].{{sfn|Schroeder|2019}}


==See also==
==Gallery==

{|align=right
<gallery>
|<gallery widths="90" heights="90" perrow="3">
File:Globular amphora burial 1.jpg|Globular Amphora tomb
File:Archäologisches Landesmuseum Schloss Gottorf 076.JPG|Pottery and axes
File:Smac Neolithikum 111.jpg|Copper ornament
File:Smac Neolithikum 111.jpg|Copper ornament
File:Danneil-Museum 037.JPG|Pottery
File:Möller Derfflinger Hügel Steinkiste Beigaben 03.jpg|Globular amphora
File:MUFT - Kalbsrieth Derfflinger Hügel Grab.jpg|Stone cist burial
File:Smac Neolithikum 075.jpg|Burial
File:Smac Neolithikum 084.jpg|Cattle burial
File:Großsteingrab Zörbig Kugelamphore.png|Pottery
File:Archäologisches Landesmuseum Schloss Gottorf 076.JPG|Pottery and axes
</gallery>
</gallery>

|}
==See also==

* [[Unetice culture]]
* [[Unetice culture]]
* [[Havelland culture]]


==Notes==
==Notes==
Line 64: Line 74:
*[[J. P. Mallory]], "Globular Amphora Culture", ''Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture'', Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997.
*[[J. P. Mallory]], "Globular Amphora Culture", ''Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture'', Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997.
* {{cite journal |last1=Mathieson |first1=Iain |date=February 21, 2018 |title=The Genomic History of Southeastern Europe |url= |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |publisher=[[Nature Research]] |volume=555 |issue=7695 |pages=197–203 |bibcode= 2018Natur.555..197M|doi=10.1038/nature25778 |pmc=6091220 |pmid=29466330 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Mathieson |first1=Iain |date=February 21, 2018 |title=The Genomic History of Southeastern Europe |url= |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |publisher=[[Nature Research]] |volume=555 |issue=7695 |pages=197–203 |bibcode= 2018Natur.555..197M|doi=10.1038/nature25778 |pmc=6091220 |pmid=29466330 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Schroeder |first1=H |date=May 28, 2019 |title=Unraveling ancestry, kinship, and violence in a Late Neolithic mass grave |journal=[[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America]] |publisher=[[National Academy of Sciences]] |volume=116 |issue=22 |pages=10705–10710 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1820210116 |pmc=6561172 |pmid=31061125 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Schroeder |first1=H |date=May 28, 2019 |title=Unraveling ancestry, kinship, and violence in a Late Neolithic mass grave |journal=[[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America]] |publisher=[[National Academy of Sciences]] |volume=116 |issue=22 |pages=10705–10710 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1820210116 |pmc=6561172 |pmid=31061125 |bibcode=2019PNAS..11610705S |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Tassi |first1=Francesca |date=November 27, 2017 |title=The Genomic History of Southeastern Europe |url= |journal=[[Proceedings of the Royal Society|Proceedings of the Royal Society B]] |publisher=[[Royal Society]] |volume=284 |issue=1867 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2017.1540 |pmc=5719168 |pmid=29167359 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Tassi |first1=Francesca |date=November 27, 2017 |title=The Genomic History of Southeastern Europe |url= |journal=[[Proceedings of the Royal Society|Proceedings of the Royal Society B]] |publisher=[[Royal Society]] |volume=284 |issue=1867 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2017.1540 |pmc=5719168 |pmid=29167359 }}

==External links==
{{commons category-inline}}


{{Neolithic Europe}}
{{Neolithic Europe}}


[[Category:Globular Amphora culture| ]]
[[Category:Globular Amphora culture| ]]
[[Category:Archaeological cultures of Central Europe]]
[[Category:Archaeological cultures of Europe]]
[[Category:Archaeological cultures of Eastern Europe]]
[[Category:Chalcolithic cultures of Europe]]
[[Category:Chalcolithic cultures of Europe]]
[[Category:Archaeological cultures in Belarus]]
[[Category:Archaeological cultures in Belarus]]
Line 80: Line 92:
[[Category:Archaeological cultures in Romania]]
[[Category:Archaeological cultures in Romania]]
[[Category:Archaeological cultures in Ukraine]]
[[Category:Archaeological cultures in Ukraine]]
[[Category:4th millennium BC]]
[[Category:3rd millennium BC]]

Revision as of 12:41, 11 May 2024

Globular Amphora culture
Geographical rangeCentral Europe
PeriodChalcolithic
Datescirca 3400 BCE – circa 2800 BCE
Preceded byFunnelbeaker culture, Lengyel culture, Cucuteni-Trypillia culture
Followed byCorded Ware culture

The Globular Amphora culture (GAC, ‹See Tfd›German: Kugelamphoren-Kultur (KAK); c. 3400–2800 BC, is an archaeological culture in Central Europe. Marija Gimbutas assumed an Indo-European origin,[1] though this is contradicted by newer genetic studies that show a connection to the earlier wave of Early European Farmers rather than to Western Steppe Herders from the Ukrainian and south-western Russian steppes.[2]

The GAC preceded the Corded Ware culture in its central area. Somewhat to the south and west, it was bordered by the Baden culture. To the northeast was the Narva culture. It occupied much of the same area as the earlier Funnelbeaker culture. The name was coined by Gustaf Kossinna because of the characteristic pottery, globular-shaped pots with two to four handles.

Extent

The Globular Amphora culture was located in an area defined by the Elbe catchment on the west and that of the Vistula on the east, extending southwards to the middle Dniester and eastwards to reach the Dnieper. West of the Elbe, some globular amphorae are found in megalithic graves. The GAC finds in the steppe area are normally attributed to a rather late expansion between 2950 and 2350 cal. BC from a centre in Wolhynia and Podolia.

Economy

The economy was based on raising a variety of livestock, pigs particularly in its earlier phase, in distinction to the Funnelbeaker culture's preference for cattle. Settlements are sparse, and these normally just contain small clusters pits. No convincing house-plans have yet been excavated. It is suggested that some of these settlements were not year-round, or indeed may have been temporary.

Burials

Globular Amphora

The GAC is primarily known from its burials. Inhumation was in a pit or cist. A variety of grave offerings were left, including animal parts (such as a pig's jaw) or even whole animals, e.g., oxen. Grave gifts include the typical globular amphorae and stone axes. There are also cattle-burials, often in pairs, accompanied by grave gifts. There are also secondary burials in Megalithic graves.

Interpretation

Globular Amphora pottery

The inclusion of animals in the grave is seen as an intrusive cultural element by Marija Gimbutas. The practice of suttee, hypothesized by Gimbutas is also seen as a highly intrusive cultural element. The supporters of the Kurgan hypothesis point to these distinctive burial practices and state this may represent one of the earliest migrations of Indo-Europeans into Central Europe. In this context and given its area of occupation, this culture has been claimed as the underlying culture of a Germanic-Baltic-Slavic continuum.[3]

Genetics

Tassi et al. (2017) extracted fifteen samples of mtDNA.[4] The majority of the samples belonged to subclades of U and Haplogroup H (mtDNA), along with J, W and K. The remains were found to be closely related to Early European Farmers and Western Hunter-Gatherers, with little genetic relation to the Yamnaya culture of Western Steppe Herders in the east. The authors of the study suggested that the Globulara Amphora culture was non-Indo-European-speaking, but with cultural influences from Yamnaya.

Mathieson et al. (2018) included a genetic analysis of eight males of the Globular Amphora culture. Three of them carried haplogroup I2a2a1b and a subclade of it; two carried I2a2; one carried I2; one carried BT and one carried CT.[5] According to admixture analysis they also had approximately 70% EEF ancestry and 30% WHG ancestry, some of them with negligible Eastern Hunter-Gatherer and Yamnaya traces.[6]

Schroeder et al. (2019) examined 15 skeletons from the Koszyce mass grave in southern Poland, which is ascribed to the Globular Amphora culture. The individuals were all shown to be members of an extended family, and to have been buried with great care by someone who knew them very well. Most of them were female and children. All had been executed by a violent blow to the head, perhaps by invading Corded Ware groups.[a] The older males of the family are missing from the grave, suggesting that they were away or had fled. Of the eight samples of Y-DNA extracted, all were found to belong to I2a-L801. The fifteen mtDNA samples consisted of various subclades of T, H, J, K, HV. The skeletons showed about 70% EEF ancestry and 30% WHG ancestry, meaning they had no Indo-European WSH-ancestry. The archaeological and genetic evidence collected from the grave indicated that the Globular Amphora culture was patriarchal and kinship-oriented, which appears to have been the norm for Late Neolithic communities in Central Europe.[7]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "All individuals had been brutally killed by blows to the head, but buried with great care.... From a population genetic viewpoint, the individuals are clearly distinct from neighboring Corded Ware groups because of their lack of steppe-related ancestry. Although the reason for the massacre is unknown, it is possible that it was connected with the expansion of Corded Ware groups, which may have resulted in violent conflict."[7]

References

  1. ^ Marija Gimbutas (2001). The Living Goddesses. University of California Press. p. 188. ISBN 978-0520229150.
  2. ^ Tassi, F. et al. (2017). Genome diversity in the Neolithic Globular Amphorae culture and the spread of Indo-European languages. Proc. R. Soc. B 284:20171540. https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1540
  3. ^ J. P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams, Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture, Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, London and Chicago, 1997., "Globular Amphora culture"
  4. ^ Tassi 2017.
  5. ^ Mathieson 2018.
  6. ^ Mathieson 2018, Extended Data Figure 2: Supervised ADMIXTURE analysis.
  7. ^ a b Schroeder 2019.

Sources

Media related to Globular amphora culture at Wikimedia Commons