Jump to content

Balance of performance: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
proper term?
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: title. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Ost316 | Category:AfC pending submissions by age/1 day ago‎ | via #UCB_Category
Line 5: Line 5:
== History ==
== History ==


The first documented use of the term "balance of performance" dates back to the creation of [[Group GT3]] in 2005 for the 2006 racing season, using experience learned from [[homologation (motorsport)|homologation special]] phenomenon in previous GT classes,<ref name=sc365-sro>{{cite web |last1=Sportscar365 Staff |title=Inside SRO’s BoP System |url=https://sportscar365.com/sro/sro-america/world-challenge-america/inside-sros-bop-system/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> although other series such as [[British Touring Car Championship]] and Japanese [[Super GT]] series had applied similar concept in the past (and still in effect today) called ''weight ballast'', which only affected the weight of a competing car for each round. The aim of the system is to allow development of various racing models without leading to expensive development wars between manufacturers.<ref name=sc365-sro/> The system was later adopted for other production-based racing classes such as [[Group GT4]], [[LM GTE]] and [[TCR Touring Car]]s. Although [[open-wheel racing|open-wheel]] and [[sports prototype|prototype car racing]] typically do not use a BoP system, a similar system was devised for [[Le Mans Prototype|LMP1]] class in [[FIA World Endurance Championship]] called '''equivalence of technology''' (abbreviated '''EoT'''), that allows for parity between [[hybrid car|hybrid]] and non-hybrid cars in the class.<ref name="fiawec-eot">{{cite web |title=Equivalence of Technology |url=https://www.fiawec.com/en/equivalence-of-technology/76 |website=FIA World Endurance Championship |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> Additionally, [[Daytona Prototype International|DPi]] and LMP2 cars in [[WeatherTech SportsCar Championship]] are subject to balance of performance as well.<ref name=autoweek-imsa>{{cite web |last1=IMSA Wire Service |title=Understanding IMSA's Balance of Performance and Why It's Necessary |url=https://www.autoweek.com/racing/more-racing/a30308257/understanding-imsas-balance-of-performance-and-why-its-necessary/ |website=Autoweek |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>
The first documented use of the term "balance of performance" dates back to the creation of [[Group GT3]] in 2005 for the 2006 racing season, using experience learned from [[homologation (motorsport)|homologation special]] phenomenon in previous GT classes,<ref name=sc365-sro>{{cite web |last1=Sportscar365 Staff |title=Inside SRO's BoP System |url=https://sportscar365.com/sro/sro-america/world-challenge-america/inside-sros-bop-system/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> although other series such as [[British Touring Car Championship]] and Japanese [[Super GT]] series had applied similar concept in the past (and still in effect today) called ''weight ballast'', which only affected the weight of a competing car for each round. The aim of the system is to allow development of various racing models without leading to expensive development wars between manufacturers.<ref name=sc365-sro/> The system was later adopted for other production-based racing classes such as [[Group GT4]], [[LM GTE]] and [[TCR Touring Car]]s. Although [[open-wheel racing|open-wheel]] and [[sports prototype|prototype car racing]] typically do not use a BoP system, a similar system was devised for [[Le Mans Prototype|LMP1]] class in [[FIA World Endurance Championship]] called '''equivalence of technology''' (abbreviated '''EoT'''), that allows for parity between [[hybrid car|hybrid]] and non-hybrid cars in the class.<ref name="fiawec-eot">{{cite web |title=Equivalence of Technology |url=https://www.fiawec.com/en/equivalence-of-technology/76 |website=FIA World Endurance Championship |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> Additionally, [[Daytona Prototype International|DPi]] and LMP2 cars in [[WeatherTech SportsCar Championship]] are subject to balance of performance as well.<ref name=autoweek-imsa>{{cite web |last1=IMSA Wire Service |title=Understanding IMSA's Balance of Performance and Why It's Necessary |url=https://www.autoweek.com/racing/more-racing/a30308257/understanding-imsas-balance-of-performance-and-why-its-necessary/ |website=Autoweek |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>


== Mechanism ==
== Mechanism ==


Balance of performance is assigned by testing and analysis of a certain model's performance through previous races, although alternate methods may be used if the competing vehicle is new. For example, for GT3 cars, [[Stephane Ratel Organisation|SRO]] holds two BoP tests a year at [[Circuit Paul Ricard]], with cars driven by professional racing drivers who would have driven the car, to assess the performance of, and thus assign the BoP, of each car.<ref name=sc365-sro/> These cars are equipped with a organizer-supplied [[telemetry]] device so that the organizer can gather data to allow the balancing of the cars, with new-to-class cars also subject to [[wind tunnel]] and [[dynometer]] testing. Once the results are obtained, various aspects of the car that can affect the car's performance such as engine horsepower, vehicle weight, aerodynamics, are then adjusted.<ref name=autoweek-imsa/><ref>{{cite web |last1=Kilbey |first1=Stephen |title=Understanding Balance Of Performance |url=http://www.dailysportscar.com/2016/08/10/understanding-balance-of-performance.html |website=Dailysportscar |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> By analyzing performance patterns of each car, organizers can change BoP of a car at any point during the season.<ref name=autoblog-bop>{{cite web |last1=Austin |first1=Michael |title=Ford GT dominates Le Mans qualifying, gets slapped with performance adjustment |url=https://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/17/ford-gt-dominates-le-mans-qualifying-gets-bop-change/ |website=Autoblog |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> Different series or organizers may calculate BoP differently depending on the conditions, with IMSA and [[Automobile Club de l'Ouest|ACO]] applying different BoP calculation for LM GTE cars in their respective series,<ref name=sc365-porsche>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=Ujhasi: IMSA, WEC Succeeding in “Different Ways” of Achieving BoPs |url=https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/ujhasi-porsche-no-master-way-to-control-bop/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=autoblog-bop/>, while TCR has a unique feature called compensation weight, as a further mechanism to balance the cars.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kinch |first1=Phil |title=TCR Talk Explains: The Balance of Performance & Compensation Weight |url=https://tcrtalk.com/2019/03/24/tcr-talk-explains-bop-and-compensation-weight/ |website=TCR Talk |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>
Balance of performance is assigned by testing and analysis of a certain model's performance through previous races, although alternate methods may be used if the competing vehicle is new. For example, for GT3 cars, [[Stephane Ratel Organisation|SRO]] holds two BoP tests a year at [[Circuit Paul Ricard]], with cars driven by professional racing drivers who would have driven the car, to assess the performance of, and thus assign the BoP, of each car.<ref name=sc365-sro/> These cars are equipped with a organizer-supplied [[telemetry]] device so that the organizer can gather data to allow the balancing of the cars, with new-to-class cars also subject to [[wind tunnel]] and [[dynometer]] testing. Once the results are obtained, various aspects of the car that can affect the car's performance such as engine horsepower, vehicle weight, aerodynamics, are then adjusted.<ref name=autoweek-imsa/><ref>{{cite web |last1=Kilbey |first1=Stephen |title=Understanding Balance Of Performance |url=http://www.dailysportscar.com/2016/08/10/understanding-balance-of-performance.html |website=Dailysportscar |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> By analyzing performance patterns of each car, organizers can change BoP of a car at any point during the season.<ref name=autoblog-bop>{{cite web |last1=Austin |first1=Michael |title=Ford GT dominates Le Mans qualifying, gets slapped with performance adjustment |url=https://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/17/ford-gt-dominates-le-mans-qualifying-gets-bop-change/ |website=Autoblog |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> Different series or organizers may calculate BoP differently depending on the conditions, with IMSA and [[Automobile Club de l'Ouest|ACO]] applying different BoP calculation for LM GTE cars in their respective series,<ref name=sc365-porsche>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=Ujhasi: IMSA, WEC Succeeding in "Different Ways" of Achieving BoPs |url=https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/ujhasi-porsche-no-master-way-to-control-bop/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=autoblog-bop/>, while TCR has a unique feature called compensation weight, as a further mechanism to balance the cars.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kinch |first1=Phil |title=TCR Talk Explains: The Balance of Performance & Compensation Weight |url=https://tcrtalk.com/2019/03/24/tcr-talk-explains-bop-and-compensation-weight/ |website=TCR Talk |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>


Some manufacturers have been accused of [[sandbagging (racing)|sandbagging]], where a car would purposely underperform during a test, or during certain races, to receive favorable results later; for example, rival teams accused [[Ford GT]] of sandbagging during the [[2016 FIA World Endurance Championship]], even after performance adjustments after the qualifying for [[2016 24 Hours of Le Mans]]<ref name=sc365-fordgt>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=Ford Fights Back on Sandbagging Allegations |url=https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/ford-fights-back-on-sandbagging-allegations/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=autoblog-bop/>. Various rules have been made to deter this; for example, IMSA mandated any car that is found to be sandbagging during the Roar Before the 24 (a testing session leading to the [[24 Hours of Daytona]] race) at their discretion to serve a five-minute stop and go penalty starting from 2014 season,<ref name=sc365-imsa1>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=IMSA’s New Anti-Sandbagging Rule Explained |url=https://sportscar365.com/imsa/iwsc/imsas-new-anti-sandbagging-rule-explained/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> although instances of sandbagging were still found as of 2019 race.<ref name=autoweek-scs>{{cite web |last1=Smith |first1= Steven Cole |title=Sandbagging Was Alive and Well at the IMSA Roar Before the 24 at Daytona |url=https://www.autoweek.com/racing/more-racing/a30433944/sandbagging-was-alive-and-well-at-the-imsa-roar-before-the-24-at-daytona/ |website=Autoweek |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>
Some manufacturers have been accused of [[sandbagging (racing)|sandbagging]], where a car would purposely underperform during a test, or during certain races, to receive favorable results later; for example, rival teams accused [[Ford GT]] of sandbagging during the [[2016 FIA World Endurance Championship]], even after performance adjustments after the qualifying for [[2016 24 Hours of Le Mans]]<ref name=sc365-fordgt>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=Ford Fights Back on Sandbagging Allegations |url=https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/ford-fights-back-on-sandbagging-allegations/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=autoblog-bop/>. Various rules have been made to deter this; for example, IMSA mandated any car that is found to be sandbagging during the Roar Before the 24 (a testing session leading to the [[24 Hours of Daytona]] race) at their discretion to serve a five-minute stop and go penalty starting from 2014 season,<ref name=sc365-imsa1>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=IMSA's New Anti-Sandbagging Rule Explained |url=https://sportscar365.com/imsa/iwsc/imsas-new-anti-sandbagging-rule-explained/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> although instances of sandbagging were still found as of 2019 race.<ref name=autoweek-scs>{{cite web |last1=Smith |first1= Steven Cole |title=Sandbagging Was Alive and Well at the IMSA Roar Before the 24 at Daytona |url=https://www.autoweek.com/racing/more-racing/a30433944/sandbagging-was-alive-and-well-at-the-imsa-roar-before-the-24-at-daytona/ |website=Autoweek |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 19:19, 31 August 2020

In sports car racing, balance of performance (abbreviated BoP) is a regulation and mechanism that maintains parity between competing vehicles by adjusting limits on a car's parameters, such as horsepower, weight, engine management, and aerodynamics to prevent a single manufacturer from becoming dominant in a racing class or series.

History

The first documented use of the term "balance of performance" dates back to the creation of Group GT3 in 2005 for the 2006 racing season, using experience learned from homologation special phenomenon in previous GT classes,[1] although other series such as British Touring Car Championship and Japanese Super GT series had applied similar concept in the past (and still in effect today) called weight ballast, which only affected the weight of a competing car for each round. The aim of the system is to allow development of various racing models without leading to expensive development wars between manufacturers.[1] The system was later adopted for other production-based racing classes such as Group GT4, LM GTE and TCR Touring Cars. Although open-wheel and prototype car racing typically do not use a BoP system, a similar system was devised for LMP1 class in FIA World Endurance Championship called equivalence of technology (abbreviated EoT), that allows for parity between hybrid and non-hybrid cars in the class.[2] Additionally, DPi and LMP2 cars in WeatherTech SportsCar Championship are subject to balance of performance as well.[3]

Mechanism

Balance of performance is assigned by testing and analysis of a certain model's performance through previous races, although alternate methods may be used if the competing vehicle is new. For example, for GT3 cars, SRO holds two BoP tests a year at Circuit Paul Ricard, with cars driven by professional racing drivers who would have driven the car, to assess the performance of, and thus assign the BoP, of each car.[1] These cars are equipped with a organizer-supplied telemetry device so that the organizer can gather data to allow the balancing of the cars, with new-to-class cars also subject to wind tunnel and dynometer testing. Once the results are obtained, various aspects of the car that can affect the car's performance such as engine horsepower, vehicle weight, aerodynamics, are then adjusted.[3][4] By analyzing performance patterns of each car, organizers can change BoP of a car at any point during the season.[5] Different series or organizers may calculate BoP differently depending on the conditions, with IMSA and ACO applying different BoP calculation for LM GTE cars in their respective series,[6][5], while TCR has a unique feature called compensation weight, as a further mechanism to balance the cars.[7]

Some manufacturers have been accused of sandbagging, where a car would purposely underperform during a test, or during certain races, to receive favorable results later; for example, rival teams accused Ford GT of sandbagging during the 2016 FIA World Endurance Championship, even after performance adjustments after the qualifying for 2016 24 Hours of Le Mans[8][5]. Various rules have been made to deter this; for example, IMSA mandated any car that is found to be sandbagging during the Roar Before the 24 (a testing session leading to the 24 Hours of Daytona race) at their discretion to serve a five-minute stop and go penalty starting from 2014 season,[9] although instances of sandbagging were still found as of 2019 race.[10]

References

  1. ^ a b c Sportscar365 Staff. "Inside SRO's BoP System". Sportscar365. Retrieved 30 August 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ "Equivalence of Technology". FIA World Endurance Championship. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  3. ^ a b IMSA Wire Service. "Understanding IMSA's Balance of Performance and Why It's Necessary". Autoweek. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  4. ^ Kilbey, Stephen. "Understanding Balance Of Performance". Dailysportscar. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  5. ^ a b c Austin, Michael. "Ford GT dominates Le Mans qualifying, gets slapped with performance adjustment". Autoblog. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  6. ^ Dagys, John. "Ujhasi: IMSA, WEC Succeeding in "Different Ways" of Achieving BoPs". Sportscar365. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  7. ^ Kinch, Phil. "TCR Talk Explains: The Balance of Performance & Compensation Weight". TCR Talk. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  8. ^ Dagys, John. "Ford Fights Back on Sandbagging Allegations". Sportscar365. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  9. ^ Dagys, John. "IMSA's New Anti-Sandbagging Rule Explained". Sportscar365. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  10. ^ Smith, Steven Cole. "Sandbagging Was Alive and Well at the IMSA Roar Before the 24 at Daytona". Autoweek. Retrieved 30 August 2020.