Jump to content

Balance of performance: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
still editing...
→‎Mechanism: Edited for grammar and removed information not relevant to the mechanisms of BoP.
Tags: references removed Visual edit
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Mechanism to make parity between cars in auto racing}}
{{AFC submission|t||ts=20200830152428|u=FMecha|ns=118|demo=}}<!-- Important, do not remove this line before article has been created. -->
{{use dmy dates|date=April 2023}}


In [[sports car racing]], '''balance of performance''' (abbreviated '''BoP''') is a regulation and mechanism that maintains [[parity (sports)|parity]] between competing vehicles by adjusting limits on a car's parameters, such as horsepower, weight, engine management, and aerodynamics to prevent a single manufacturer from becoming dominant in a racing class or series.
In [[sports car racing]], '''balance of performance''' ('''BoP''') is a regulation and mechanism that maintains [[parity (sports)|parity]] between competing vehicles by adjusting the limits and parameters of a vehicle such as horsepower, weight, engine management, and aerodynamics to prevent a single manufacturer from becoming dominant in a racing class or series.


== History ==
== History ==


The origin of the term "balance of performance" dates back to the creation of [[Group GT3]] in 2005 for the 2006 racing season, using experience learned from [[homologation (motorsport)|homologation special]] phenomenon in previous GT classes,<ref name=sc365-sro>{{cite web |last1=Sportscar365 Staff |title=Inside SRO's BoP System |url=https://sportscar365.com/sro/sro-america/world-challenge-america/inside-sros-bop-system/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> although other series such as [[British Touring Car Championship]] and Japanese [[Super GT]] series had applied similar concept in the past (and still in effect today) called ''weight ballast'', which only affected the weight of a competing car for each round. ([[Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters]] also previously featured a weight ballast system named as BoP between [[2015 Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters|2015]] to [[2017 Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters|2017]] until it was scrapped with two races left in the 2017 season). The aim of the system is to allow development of various racing models within a class, without leading to expensive development wars between manufacturers.<ref name=sc365-sro/> The system was later adopted for other production-based racing classes such as [[Group GT4]], [[LM GTE]] and [[TCR Touring Car]]s. Although [[open-wheel racing|open-wheel]] and [[sports prototype|prototype car racing]] typically do not use a BoP system, a similar system was devised for [[Le Mans Prototype|LMP1]] class in [[FIA World Endurance Championship]] called '''equivalence of technology''' (abbreviated '''EoT'''), that allows for parity between [[hybrid car|hybrid]] and non-hybrid cars in the class.<ref name="fiawec-eot">{{cite web |title=Equivalence of Technology |url=https://www.fiawec.com/en/equivalence-of-technology/76 |website=FIA World Endurance Championship |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> Additionally, [[Daytona Prototype International|DPi]] cars in the [[International Motor Sports Association|IMSA]] [[WeatherTech SportsCar Championship]] are subject to balance of performance as well.<ref name=autoweek-imsa>{{cite web |last1=IMSA Wire Service |title=Understanding IMSA's Balance of Performance and Why It's Necessary |url=https://www.autoweek.com/racing/more-racing/a30308257/understanding-imsas-balance-of-performance-and-why-its-necessary/ |website=Autoweek |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>
The origin of the term "balance of performance" dates back to the creation of [[Group GT3]] in 2005 for the 2006 racing season, using experience learned from the [[homologation (motorsport)|homologation special]] phenomenon in previous GT classes.<ref name=sc365-sro>{{cite web |last1=Sportscar365 Staff |title=Inside SRO's BoP System |url=https://sportscar365.com/sro/sro-america/world-challenge-america/inside-sros-bop-system/ |website=Sportscar365 |date=26 February 2017 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> Other racing series such as the [[British Touring Car Championship]] and the Japanese [[Super GT]] make use of a different regulation called ''success ballast'', which only affects the weight of a competing car. The aim of the system is to allow development of various racing models within a class, without leading to an expensive development arms-race between manufacturers.<ref name="sc365-sro" /> The system was later adopted for other production-based racing categories such as [[Group GT4]], [[LM GTE]] and [[TCR Touring Car]]s. Although [[one-make race|one-make]], [[open-wheel racing|open-wheel]] and [[sports prototype|prototype car racing]] typically do not use a balance of performance regulation, a similar system was devised for the [[Le Mans Prototype|LMP1]] class in the [[FIA World Endurance Championship]] called '''equivalence of technology''' (abbreviated '''EoT'''), that allows for parity between [[hybrid car|hybrid]] and non-hybrid cars in the class.<ref name="fiawec-eot">{{cite web |title=Equivalence of Technology |url=https://www.fiawec.com/en/equivalence-of-technology/76 |website=FIA World Endurance Championship |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> [[Daytona Prototype International|DPi]] cars in the [[International Motor Sports Association|IMSA]] [[WeatherTech SportsCar Championship]] are also subject to balance of performance regulations.<ref name=autoweek-imsa>{{cite web |last1=IMSA Wire Service |title=Understanding IMSA's Balance of Performance and Why It's Necessary |url=https://www.autoweek.com/racing/more-racing/a30308257/understanding-imsas-balance-of-performance-and-why-its-necessary/ |website=Autoweek |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>


== Mechanism ==
== Mechanism ==


Balance of performance is assigned by testing and analysis of a certain model's performance through previous races, although alternate methods may be used if the competing vehicle is new. For example, for GT3 cars, [[Stephane Ratel Organisation|SRO]] holds two BoP tests a year at [[Circuit Paul Ricard]], with cars driven by professional racing drivers who would have driven the car, to assess the performance of, and thus assign the BoP, of each car.<ref name=sc365-sro/> These cars are equipped with a organizer-supplied [[telemetry]] device so that the organizer can gather data to allow the balancing of the cars, with new-to-class cars also subject to [[wind tunnel]] and [[dynometer]] testing. Once the results are obtained, various aspects of the car that can affect the car's performance such as engine horsepower, vehicle weight, aerodynamics, are then adjusted.<ref name=autoweek-imsa/><ref>{{cite web |last1=Kilbey |first1=Stephen |title=Understanding Balance Of Performance |url=http://www.dailysportscar.com/2016/08/10/understanding-balance-of-performance.html |website=Dailysportscar |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> By analyzing performance patterns of each car, organizers can change BoP of a car at any point during the season.<ref name=autoblog-bop>{{cite web |last1=Austin |first1=Michael |title=Ford GT dominates Le Mans qualifying, gets slapped with performance adjustment |url=https://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/17/ford-gt-dominates-le-mans-qualifying-gets-bop-change/ |website=Autoblog |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> Different series or organizers may calculate BoP differently depending on the conditions, with IMSA and [[Automobile Club de l'Ouest|ACO]] applying different BoP calculation for LM GTE cars in their respective series,<ref name=sc365-porsche>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=Ujhasi: IMSA, WEC Succeeding in "Different Ways" of Achieving BoPs |url=https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/ujhasi-porsche-no-master-way-to-control-bop/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=autoblog-bop/>, while BoP for GT3 cars participating in Super GT's GT300 class are optimized to allow competition against cars built exclusively for the series<ref>{{cite web|last1=Dagys|first1=John|title=SRO to Create Specialized GT3 BoP for Super GT - Sportscar365|url=http://sportscar365.com/other-series/super-gt/sro-to-create-specialized-gt3-bop-for-super-gt/|website=Sportscar365|accessdate=27 July 2017}}</ref>, and TCR has a unique feature called compensation weight, as a further mechanism to balance the cars.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kinch |first1=Phil |title=TCR Talk Explains: The Balance of Performance & Compensation Weight |url=https://tcrtalk.com/2019/03/24/tcr-talk-explains-bop-and-compensation-weight/ |website=TCR Talk |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>
Balance of performance is assigned by testing and analysis of a certain model's performance through previous races, and in some cases between sessions in the same race weekend. Alternate methods may be used if the competing vehicle is new. For example, for GT3 cars, [[Stephane Ratel Organisation|SRO]] holds two balance of performance tests every year at [[Circuit Paul Ricard]], with cars driven by racing drivers who already compete in them, in order to assess the performance of each car, and balance the performance of the vehicles accordingly.<ref name=sc365-sro/> These cars are equipped with an organizer-supplied [[telemetry]] device so that the organizer can gather data to allow the balancing of the cars, with new-to-class cars also subject to [[wind tunnel]] and [[dynometer]] testing. Once the results are obtained, various aspects of the car that can affect the car's performance such as engine power, vehicle weight, and aerodynamics are adjusted.<ref name=autoweek-imsa/><ref>{{cite web |last1=Kilbey |first1=Stephen |title=Understanding Balance Of Performance |url=http://www.dailysportscar.com/2016/08/10/understanding-balance-of-performance.html |website=Dailysportscar |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> By analyzing performance patterns of each car, organizers can change the balance of performance of a car at any point during the season.<ref name=autoblog-bop>{{cite web |last1=Austin |first1=Michael |title=Ford GT dominates Le Mans qualifying, gets slapped with performance adjustment |url=https://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/17/ford-gt-dominates-le-mans-qualifying-gets-bop-change/ |website=Autoblog |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref> Different series or organizers may calculate BoP differently depending on the conditions, with IMSA and [[Automobile Club de l'Ouest|ACO]] applying different BoP calculations for LM GTE cars in their respective series.<ref name=sc365-porsche>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=Ujhasi: IMSA, WEC Succeeding in "Different Ways" of Achieving BoPs |url=https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/ujhasi-porsche-no-master-way-to-control-bop/ |website=Sportscar365 |date=21 July 2017 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=autoblog-bop/> The BoP for GT3 cars participating in Super GT's GT300 class are optimized to allow competition against cars built exclusively for the series.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Dagys|first1=John|title=SRO to Create Specialized GT3 BoP for Super GT - Sportscar365|url=http://sportscar365.com/other-series/super-gt/sro-to-create-specialized-gt3-bop-for-super-gt/|website=Sportscar365|date=17 November 2014 |accessdate=27 July 2017}}</ref> TCR has a unique feature called compensation weight, as a further mechanism to balance the cars.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kinch |first1=Phil |title=TCR Talk Explains: The Balance of Performance & Compensation Weight |url=https://tcrtalk.com/2019/03/24/tcr-talk-explains-bop-and-compensation-weight/ |website=TCR Talk |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>


Some manufacturers have been accused of [[sandbagging (racing)|sandbagging]], where a car would purposely underperform during a test, or during certain races, to receive favorable results later; for example, rival teams accused the [[Ford GT]] (run by [[Chip Ganassi Racing]]) of sandbagging during the [[2016 FIA World Endurance Championship]] season, even after performance adjustments after the qualifying for [[2016 24 Hours of Le Mans]]<ref name=sc365-fordgt>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=Ford Fights Back on Sandbagging Allegations |url=https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/ford-fights-back-on-sandbagging-allegations/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=autoblog-bop/>. Various rules have been made to deter this; for example, IMSA mandated any car that is found to be sandbagging during the Roar Before the 24 (a testing session leading to the [[24 Hours of Daytona]] race) at their discretion to serve a five-minute stop and go penalty starting from 2014 season if a team is caught sandbagging during the sessions (penalties are served different if the sandbagging was discovered ''after'' the end of the sessions)<ref name=sc365-imsa1>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=IMSA's New Anti-Sandbagging Rule Explained |url=https://sportscar365.com/imsa/iwsc/imsas-new-anti-sandbagging-rule-explained/ |website=Sportscar365 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>, although instances of sandbagging were still found as of 2019 race.<ref name=autoweek-scs>{{cite web |last1=Smith |first1= Steven Cole |title=Sandbagging Was Alive and Well at the IMSA Roar Before the 24 at Daytona |url=https://www.autoweek.com/racing/more-racing/a30433944/sandbagging-was-alive-and-well-at-the-imsa-roar-before-the-24-at-daytona/ |website=Autoweek |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref>
Some manufacturers have been accused of [[sandbagging (racing)|sandbagging]], where a car would purposely underperform during a test, or during certain races, to receive favorable results later; for example, rival teams accused the [[Ford GT]] (run by [[Chip Ganassi Racing]]) of sandbagging during the [[2016 FIA World Endurance Championship]] season, even after performance adjustments for the qualifying session for the [[2016 24 Hours of Le Mans]] race.<ref name=sc365-fordgt>{{cite web |last1=Dagys |first1=John |title=Ford Fights Back on Sandbagging Allegations |url=https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/ford-fights-back-on-sandbagging-allegations/ |website=Sportscar365 |date=26 July 2016 |accessdate=30 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=autoblog-bop/> Various rules have been made to deter this; IMSA mandated any car that is found to be sandbagging during the Roar Before the 24 (a testing session leading to the [[24 Hours of Daytona]] race) will serve a five-minute stop-and-go penalty during the race.

Several racing games, such as ''[[Gran Turismo Sport]], [[Gran Turismo 7]], [[RaceRoom]]'' and ''[[Assetto Corsa Competizione]]'', also feature a simulated balance of performance for each playable car as part of the games' [[game balance]] mechanism.


== References ==
== References ==
Line 17: Line 20:
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


[[Category:Motorsport terminology]]
{{AFC submission|||ts=20200830155806|u=FMecha|ns=118}}

Latest revision as of 06:57, 9 June 2024

In sports car racing, balance of performance (BoP) is a regulation and mechanism that maintains parity between competing vehicles by adjusting the limits and parameters of a vehicle such as horsepower, weight, engine management, and aerodynamics to prevent a single manufacturer from becoming dominant in a racing class or series.

History[edit]

The origin of the term "balance of performance" dates back to the creation of Group GT3 in 2005 for the 2006 racing season, using experience learned from the homologation special phenomenon in previous GT classes.[1] Other racing series such as the British Touring Car Championship and the Japanese Super GT make use of a different regulation called success ballast, which only affects the weight of a competing car. The aim of the system is to allow development of various racing models within a class, without leading to an expensive development arms-race between manufacturers.[1] The system was later adopted for other production-based racing categories such as Group GT4, LM GTE and TCR Touring Cars. Although one-make, open-wheel and prototype car racing typically do not use a balance of performance regulation, a similar system was devised for the LMP1 class in the FIA World Endurance Championship called equivalence of technology (abbreviated EoT), that allows for parity between hybrid and non-hybrid cars in the class.[2] DPi cars in the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship are also subject to balance of performance regulations.[3]

Mechanism[edit]

Balance of performance is assigned by testing and analysis of a certain model's performance through previous races, and in some cases between sessions in the same race weekend. Alternate methods may be used if the competing vehicle is new. For example, for GT3 cars, SRO holds two balance of performance tests every year at Circuit Paul Ricard, with cars driven by racing drivers who already compete in them, in order to assess the performance of each car, and balance the performance of the vehicles accordingly.[1] These cars are equipped with an organizer-supplied telemetry device so that the organizer can gather data to allow the balancing of the cars, with new-to-class cars also subject to wind tunnel and dynometer testing. Once the results are obtained, various aspects of the car that can affect the car's performance such as engine power, vehicle weight, and aerodynamics are adjusted.[3][4] By analyzing performance patterns of each car, organizers can change the balance of performance of a car at any point during the season.[5] Different series or organizers may calculate BoP differently depending on the conditions, with IMSA and ACO applying different BoP calculations for LM GTE cars in their respective series.[6][5] The BoP for GT3 cars participating in Super GT's GT300 class are optimized to allow competition against cars built exclusively for the series.[7] TCR has a unique feature called compensation weight, as a further mechanism to balance the cars.[8]

Some manufacturers have been accused of sandbagging, where a car would purposely underperform during a test, or during certain races, to receive favorable results later; for example, rival teams accused the Ford GT (run by Chip Ganassi Racing) of sandbagging during the 2016 FIA World Endurance Championship season, even after performance adjustments for the qualifying session for the 2016 24 Hours of Le Mans race.[9][5] Various rules have been made to deter this; IMSA mandated any car that is found to be sandbagging during the Roar Before the 24 (a testing session leading to the 24 Hours of Daytona race) will serve a five-minute stop-and-go penalty during the race.

Several racing games, such as Gran Turismo Sport, Gran Turismo 7, RaceRoom and Assetto Corsa Competizione, also feature a simulated balance of performance for each playable car as part of the games' game balance mechanism.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Sportscar365 Staff (26 February 2017). "Inside SRO's BoP System". Sportscar365. Retrieved 30 August 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ "Equivalence of Technology". FIA World Endurance Championship. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  3. ^ a b IMSA Wire Service. "Understanding IMSA's Balance of Performance and Why It's Necessary". Autoweek. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  4. ^ Kilbey, Stephen. "Understanding Balance Of Performance". Dailysportscar. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  5. ^ a b c Austin, Michael. "Ford GT dominates Le Mans qualifying, gets slapped with performance adjustment". Autoblog. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  6. ^ Dagys, John (21 July 2017). "Ujhasi: IMSA, WEC Succeeding in "Different Ways" of Achieving BoPs". Sportscar365. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  7. ^ Dagys, John (17 November 2014). "SRO to Create Specialized GT3 BoP for Super GT - Sportscar365". Sportscar365. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
  8. ^ Kinch, Phil. "TCR Talk Explains: The Balance of Performance & Compensation Weight". TCR Talk. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  9. ^ Dagys, John (26 July 2016). "Ford Fights Back on Sandbagging Allegations". Sportscar365. Retrieved 30 August 2020.