x264 1745 gcc 4.4.4 versus gcc 4.5.1 - Page 2

kemuri-_9 · 19th October 2010, 13:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoRd_MuldeR

(BTW: Is there any reason why are we comparing GCC 4.4.4 here, after 4.4.5 has already been officially released from the 4.4.x tree? Any regressions I should know?)

easy answer: 4.4.4 is the version bob0r compiled from the 4.4.x series, he hasn't compiled 4.4.5

bob0r · 19th October 2010, 18:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by kemuri-_9

easy answer: 4.4.4 is the version bob0r compiled from the 4.4.x series, he hasn't compiled 4.4.5

An even easier answer, it's in the first post, it crashes.

kemuri-_9 · 19th October 2010, 23:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob0r

An even easier answer, it's in the first post, it crashes.

4.4.5 works here, so it looks like you miscompiled gcc.

LoRd_MuldeR · 20th October 2010, 12:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by kemuri-_9

4.4.5 works here, so it looks like you miscompiled gcc.

Same here. x264 seems to compile just fine with GCC 4.4.5 for me. I use Komisar's build:
http://komisar.gin.by/mingw/index.html

bob0r · 21st October 2010, 16:58

I know, when i compile it myself, it works, but only in combination with the script, it fails. So _something_ must be called or whatever... ill recompile it later and test again.

bob0r · 22nd October 2010, 17:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by kemuri-_9

4.4.5 works here, so it looks like you miscompiled gcc.

Seems you were right!

gcc 4.4.5: http://x264.nl/dump/x264_1745_gcc_4.4.5/x264.exe

I assume 4.4.5 is not that much faster over 4.4.5, but those who already ran a test, can retest it.

But it looks like we're updating to 4.5.1.

View Poll Results: Which gcc version makes x264 1745 encode faster?
gcc 4.4.4	3	17.65%
gcc 4.5.1	14	82.35%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

21st October 2010, 16:58	#25 \| Link
bob0r Pain and suffering Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,337	I know, when i compile it myself, it works, but only in combination with the script, it fails. So _something_ must be called or whatever... ill recompile it later and test again.